Death penalty Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 1

Death penalty - Research Paper drillThe criminal justice system is implemented under imperfect conditions. Risks of convicting necessitous individuals within the system bring in been seen all too often. These risks are some of the primary considerations in the opposition of the demise penalty that innocent individuals may be put to ending because of this imperfect system. For which reason, this paper now seeks to discuss the abolition of the death penalty. It presents arguments and supporting theories and discussions on the abolition of the death penalty within the criminal justice system. Discussion I believe that death penalty should be abolished because it is an inhumane punishment. Death destroys an individuals status and his or her very existence in organized society (Chenwi, p. 97). In effect, the death penalty is a realise of punishment which practically strips a person of his rights and his rightful place in an orderly and peaceful society. The causticity of the death penalty as a punishment degrades human beings and strips them of honor. It summarizes and defines their life into one act of personnel and deems such life to be unworthy of continuance. And such summary judgment is something which should not be support The imposition of the death penalty must be prevented because of the criminal justice system is basically imperfect. No matter what evidence is often unearthed from any criminal investigation, to some degree, such evidence cannot often altogether prove a persons commission of a crime. The possibility of convicting a person of a crime he did not commit has been proven true time and again (Cole and Smith, p. 405). The possibility because of sending someone to his death for a crime he did not commit is also a severe wishlihood. This is a risk we cannot prevent and manage with the death penalty because, unlike imprisonment strong belief which can be carried out in jail, carrying out the death sentence is irreversible. On the off p lay that a person is indeed later proven innocent, imprisonment affords a person freedom. But death? Death is a one-way ticket. Lang also set forth these same arguments. He argues that there is a distinct possibility that a person who is wrongly convicted of a crime would be sentenced to death. This is a strong possibility which is too grim for me to consider. It would be wrong for us to close our eyes to this grim possibility. Lang discusses the injustices suffered by Michael Blair as a basis for his opposition to the death penalty. He discusses how evidence eventually presented in chat up successfully proved that Blair was innocent of the crime being charged against him. However, this was after fourteen years fatigued in death row. This was after fourteen years of emotional trauma waiting for the possibility of having his whirl next to the proverbial chopping block. Blair also lost fourteen years of his life a life which could dedicate been productive in terms of career, fam ily, and social life. Until and unless we can absolutely avoid more Michael Blair incidents can we safely consider the possibility of imposing the death penalty as a means of deterring crime and render punishment to criminals. It would be difficult to gauge and decide that things would have been better off for people like Michael Blair, but in considering the cases on mentally retarded individuals, being