Social Work Reflective Essay

aff up to(p) make Reflective EssayIntroduction Reflection forms a central part of cordial clear perpetrate and education, and it is circumstancely grievous for hearty subject realmers in functionment scopes or newly qualified neighborly excogitateers (Dcruz et al, 2007 Parker, 2010). In its simplest terms, observation provides us with an opportunity to review our decisions and decision-making processes however, in pr runice, verbal expression is a far untold complex concept (Trevethick, 2005 251). It is essential that cordial persisters live the confidence to question their ingest practice, the organisation that they bat in, and controlling power structures in society at large (Fook, 1999). Reflection, and in grouchy detailed brooding practice, forms a key part of this, as kind workers are called on to reconsider and re make up the dominant favorable discourse. In this essay I will explore my consume of reproach during my practice placement, and in pa rticular in proportion to a proper(postnominal) shell study. I will start by offlining my practice backcloth, and the details of the particular wooing study. I will and then explore my experience of contemplation, and how pondering practice victualsed me to apply system to practice. Finally take a critical look at my practice, and suggest things that I could invite got through with(p) assortedly. Although I engage with and explored sixfold patterns of formulation during my placement, the exercise of reflection that I engraft most multipurpose was Schons theory of reflection (Schon, 1983 2002). Schon advocated 2 types of meditative practice. Firstly, reflection-on-action, which involves reflecting on an experience that you arrive at already had, or an action that you have already taken, and considering what could have been do variously, as well as tone at the positives from that interaction. The other type of reflection Schon nones is reflection-in-actio n, or reflecting on your actions as you are doing them, and considering issues homogeneous best practice throughout the process. Due to the limits of the topical medium, I will be condenseing mostly on reflection-on-action. However, charm use of this type of reflection should inform future practice, and encourage divert reflection-in-action when presented with a similar situation again. habituate Setting My placement was engraft at a non for profit genial wellness agency, where we provided psycho- well-disposed support for flock who have go through cordial health difficulties. Many of the people that we worked with had been subject to section 2 or 3 set outs under the genial wellness Act 1983/2007, and were now experiencing aftercare under section 117. Referrals to the agency could hump from loving armed services, GP surgeries, and other not-for-profit organisations. The people with whom we worked normally had a masses of presenting issues and concerns, and I was a ware from the onset that complex settings like this require social workers to be reflective in their practice in order to be able to deal with a variety of situations (Fook and Gardner, 2007). However, it soon became clear to me that the fast working(a) environment, where at propagation paperwork was promoted over practice, meant that reflection could potentially be ignored in favour of bureaucracy and targets (DCruz et al, 2007). This type of difficulty and distrust most reflection is common in placement settings and when starting a new role (Knott and Spafford, 2010). Reflection was especially meaning(a) when making the enactment from university learning to the learning experienced in a placement setting. genial workers are provided with some guidance in practice to support this process. The confide Competency Framework (PCF) domains provide some direction about what areas social workers are expected to emphasise in practice, and what take ins to be bear witness in or der to successfully complete a placement. Values and moral philosophy are central to this framework, and comprise domain 2. Critical reflection is as well part of this framework, making up the entirety of domain 6. However, it is essential that social workers do not become complacent in their someoneal reflection, and they massnot come up pricker on these types of guidance and procedures as a shield against act in reflection on complex ethical subjects (Banks, 2006). Case lease Many of the service users that we worked with had a dual diagnosis (problems with mental health and addiction). These service users particularly challenged me, as I found their intersecting issues commonly stretch well beyond their dual diagnosis, to other areas like accommodate or physical health. I have, therefore, chosen to discuss one such case, where I sedulous in substantial reflection. The emphasize to this case study, and my engagement with him, will now be discussed. JK is a man in h is 50s who was born(p) in Nigeria but locomote to the UK at a young age. When I worked with him, he lived in a housing project that was specifically meant to raise ex-offenders. Although JK had a lead key-worker at my agency who was a permanent ingredient of staff, I was responsible for the majority of the key working sessions with JK during my time on this placement. JK had a long history of substance misuse and mental health problems. He was diagnosed with bi-polar disorder, and dealt with important anxiety and depression. He received depot injections periodic for his mental health difficulties, and he found these instances particularly distressing. JK likewise had a substantial history of criminal activity, which he said became necessary in order to maintain his addiction to certain illicit drugs. I would knock against JK in a location of his choosing. Although usually this would mean either in our office or in his room, sometimes we went for a walk and I accompanied him to appointments at times also. This more than informal working setting was where he felt he could speak most openly to me. Although I will discuss my involvement with JK more broadly,I will focus on one particular key working session that we had, where JK was most descriptive about all his concerns and the issues that were effecting him (session A). This is signifi mountaint because reflection is particularly important when a critical incident like this has been experienced, and a less reflective set about could lead to a less holistic or even unwittingly autocratic account of what had transpired (Ruch, 2002). Reflective bore Different models of reflection support me throughout the reflective process. Gibbs Model of Reflection (1988) and Atkin and Murphys Model of Reflection (1994) some(prenominal) promote a cyclical approach to reflection, whereby reflection is on passing and not a linear process. I found this to be the case, as I did not move through presents of refection one after the other, but moved between them, often returning to my conceptual starting point multiple times before settling on a holistic perceptiveness of an event or situation that incorporates all systems influencing that scenario. Keeping a reflective diary of critical issues and my own thought process encouraged me to construct my understanding of the work I was doing, and justify what actions I had taken (White, 2001). conduct from colleagues and supervisors was also invaluable in this process (Ruch, 2002). Yip (2006) aptly notes that models like those appointd above are most useful when starting out the reflective process, and I quickly adapted and developed a model of reflection that was most appropriate for me. accessible work has traditionally been constructed as the professional knowing best, and continues to be practised in a trend where the practitioner holds most of the power (Holmes and Saleeby, 1993). The power dynamics are slimly different in a non-statutory setting like I was working in. However, these power dynamics cannot be ignored, and underline all social work practice.I ac knowledged the inherent power dynamics from the inception of my interactions with JK. I prize that where unequal power dynamics exist in a relationship, it is usually the partner with the most power that benefits most from the interaction (Milner and OByrne, 2002). This is why it is important for social workers to listen to the perspectives of the people with whom they work, and be willing to accept different paradigms than their own or the dominant paradigm (Milner and OByrne, 2002). When working with JK, I was make aware of his engagement with mental health services, usually provided through the medical professions. He had an allocated community psychiatric nurse (CPN) who would visit occasionally, and at times he also met with a psychiatrist. Throughout my social work education, the inconsistency between the medical model and the social model of experien cing mental malady has been stressed to me, and I all the way saw this when working with JK. The historically oppressive nature of mental health services is widely recognize in literary productions (Szasz, 1961 Foucault, 1967), and JK expressed to me at times that he felt that he was not listened to by medical professionals, and just moved from service to service having things done to him, rather than with him. Tew (2005) famous that the in the social model of mental distress, core values required include looking at the person and their situation holistically, removing the us and them thinking that scarpers to dominate mental health services, hearing to what people really have to say, and being committed to anti-oppressive practice. I found these to be very helpful in working with JK. During academic session A, the point that I chose to explore JKs mental distress alongside the other issues that were going on in his life allowed me to identify that his physical health, i ncluding intense back pain that he has been experiencing, was having a substantial effect on his mental health, and I encouraged him to seek help and support with this. JK clearly apprehended my anti-oppressive approach, where I tried to work with him in partnership, and he was always cutting to know when we would meet next. There is a stigma attached to having a mental ailment, and even when contact with services has ceased, that stigma usually persists (Miles, 2005). JK had clearly been the subject of this stigma throughout his life. Tew (2005) believes if mental health services were more receptive to the social model of looking at mental distress, then significant amounts of this stigma and the resultant oppression would be removed. Applying Theory to coiffe An important part of reflection in social work is the diligence and consideration of theories in practice (Trevethick, 2012). The theory base of social work is essential to all the work that we do in practice (Teater, 2 010). brotherly workers need to be prepared to critically reflect on the theory that they are bringing to practice. It has been noted that the theory base of social work is dominated by euro-centric discourse, meaning that certain paradigms or perspectives may be excluded unintentionally (Trevethick, 2012). Being from Nigeria originally, and coming from a different cultural background than myself, meant that I had to be particularly watchful in applying theory to the work that I did with JK.However, it is also clear that practice cannot just be base on routine or habit, with no basis in manifest (Thompson, 2009). The increasing influence of post-modern theory, which does not promote one paradigm over another, but focuses on the subjective nature of truth, has helped to alleviate these issues in social work to some accomplishment (Fook, 2012). Our agency worked with some of the most marginalised and compromising members of society, and spicy in uninformed work with these types of service users is a wicked undertaking (Collingwood et al, 2008). Through active engagement with reflection, I was able to work with JK using an eclectic theory and knowledge base, but was also careful to note if JK was not comfortable with some aspects of my approach, and adjusted the approach accordingly. works closely with JK over a period of several months supported me to be able to identify any issues quickly, and by the time I we were engaged in Session A, we had a good working relationship. Of particular grandness when working with service users who have a dual diagnosis was systems theory, and I found this theory to be particularly important when reflecting on Session A. Healy (2005) has recognised that systems theory have been highly influential on the knowledge base of social work. As noted above, people experiencing problems with addiction tend to have other issues in other areas of their lives (Tober and Raistrick, 2004).I was able incorporate specific applications of systems theory for the service user group I was working throughout my placement, and in particular with JK. The Six Cornered Addictions Rescue System (SCARS) was useful in that it withalk into account a person who was dealing with an addictions situation holistically, rather than just focusing on the addiction in isolation (McCarthy and Galvani, 2004). In Session A this allowed me to see how JKs addiction and mental health problems were also linked to issues with accommodation, physical health, relationships and employment. What could have been done differently? I have discussed my work with JK, and reflected on specific incidents and issues with him. However, returning to Schon (1983), he notes that reflection takes place inside our own understanding and the meaning that we attribute to an event, rather than within the event itself. Therefore, social workers need to look at their own central assumptions, as well as dominant social communicatorys, in order to shape their holis tic understanding and experience of a given incident. Dewey (1993) recognised the importance of discovering new information in reflection. This can come from both internal sources (personal reconsideration) and external sources (professional support or research), and this new information can completely re-construct the way that an incident or event is considered, and change the narrative that we are engaged in. This is helpful in reconsidering an event, and determining whether something could have been done differently or better. In relation to Session A, one area that I reflected on was that I may have focused too much on theory when working with JK. It has been recognised in literature around theory in practice that overly focusing on theory when working with service users can actually hinder the work being done, as the service user can feel depersonalised (Parker, 2010). As noted above, this was particularly important in the case of JK, who was from a different culture than me. More time could have been spent on listen to JK and his perspective, rather than trying to fit him into a theory or model for the sake of evidencing my own case notes or reflective journals. I worked with JK very much in isolation. Although I met his CPN and his drug worker, at no stage was a multi-agency meeting held that I was invited to. To some extent, this was the fault of the other professionals, who did not consult me on the work they were doing with JK, and literature has noted that collaboration is particularly difficult when working with dual diagnosis service users, as mental health and addiction services can disagree over the pass up course, or who should take the lead (Clement et al, 1993 Champney-Smith, 2004). However, I could have made more of an effort to engage with them, or at least discuss with JK how much consultation he would like me to have with those other workers. Suter et al (2009) have found that a willingness to communicate is a key characteristic comp ulsory for effective collaboration, and after the other professionals were not active in engaging with me, I lost this willingness, potentially to the detriment of my work with JK. It has to be noted that reflection is not always recognised as a self-evidently positive mechanism. There are critics of the way reflection is promoted in authorized practice environments, with some bemoaning the cult following that has developed around reflection in the social work sphere (Ixer, 1999 513). Boud and Knight (1996) equally describe how reflection has come to be seen as self-evidently worthwhile without significant critique (p.32). Ixer (1999) recognises that focusing too much on assessing reflection can lead to a prescriptive approach to reflection that is uncompromising. I found this to be the case at times, when I was expected to write my reflections at a certain time, and have reflective supervision in a certain way. As well as this, having someone essentially assessing my reflection m ade this even more difficult, as I was not able to reflect in a way that was personal for me. Parker (2010) has noted that reflection is not something that can be assessed based on traditional reductionist techniques. Therefore, I found it important to not just reflect on my work and the working environment, but also the process of reflection itself. mop up The issues that social workers are engaged with, and that I have discussed here, do not only reflect the concerns of the service user, but are a reflection of the issues that are inherent in wider society (Davis, 2007). Unequal power dynamics, concerns around oppression and issues with stigma are all social problems that social workers need to engage with not just on a micro-level, but also a macro-level. To some extent this is an area that I found reflection lacking in. I was able to look at my own practice, and my own assumptions and narratives however, I was unable to determine how best to address wider inequality and societ al oppression of people like JK. In this reflective essay, I have explored my practice setting in relation to a particular case study. I introduced the placement setting and the case study, and then looked at my experience of reflection within this setting. I discussed how I engaged with different models of reflection, experienced power dynamics, and explored different interpretations of mental distress. I then moved on to look at how reflection promoted me to engage with theory in practice, in particular in relation to systems theory. Finally, I used this reflection to look at things that I could have done differently, including a decreased focus on theory and engaging more with other services. This type of critical reflection should be ongoing for social workers in practice, and to some extent it would be difficult to work in a complex setting like I was without being reflective. Although I noted some areas I could have improved on in my interactions with JK, what was most appar ent in my work with him was that my willingness to explore his paradigm and perspectives opened him up to engaging with me on a range of issues, that otherwise may have remained hidden. References Atkins, S. and Murphy, K. (1994) Reflective Practice, treat Standard8(39) 49-56. Banks, S. (2006) Ethics and Values in Social officiate, Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan. Cameron, A., Lart, R., Bostock, L. and Coomber, C. (2012) Factors that promote and hinder sum and integrated working between health and social care services, capital of the United Kingdom SCIE. Champney-Smith, J. (2004) Dual Diagnosis in T. Peterson and A. McBride (Eds.) cultivateing with Substance Misusers A talent scout to Theory and Practice, capital of the United Kingdom Routledge. Clement, J., Williams, E. and Waters, C. (1993) The client with substance abuse/mental illness Mandate for Collaboration Achieves of Psychiatric Nursing, 7(4), 189-196. Collingwood, P., Emond, R. and Woodward, R. (2008) The theory c ircle A woodpecker for learning and for practice Social make up Education, 27(1), 70-83. Davis, A, (2007) Structural Approaches to Social Work in J. Lisham (Ed.) Handbook for Practice Learning in Social Work and Social Care Knowledge and Theory, London JK. Dewey, J. (1993) How we Think A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the education process, Boston Health Publishing. DCruz, H., Gillingham, P. and Melendez, S. (2007) Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work A critical review of the literature British diary of Social Work, 37, 73-90. Fook, J. (1999) Critical reflectivity in education and practice in B. Pears and J. Fook (eds) Transforming Social Work Practice Postmodern Critical Perspectives, St Leonards Allen and Unwin, 195-208. Fook, J. (2012) Social Work A Critical Approach to Practice, London Sage. Fook J. and Gardner F. (2007) Practising Critical Reflection A Resource Handbook, Maidenhead McGraw-Hill. Foucault M. (1967) Madness and Civilization A History of hallucination in the Age of Reason, London Tavistock. Gibbs, G. (1988) Learning by Doing A eviscerate to teaching and learning methods, Oxford Oxford University Press. Healy, K. (2005) Social Work Theories in Context Creating Frameworks for Practice, Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan. Holmes, G. and Saleeby, D. (1993) Empowerment, the checkup Model and the Politics of Clienthood, Journal of Progressive Human serve, 4(1), 61-78. Ixer, G. (1999) Theres no such thing as reflection British Journal of Social Work,29, 513-527. Knott, C. and Spafford, J. (2010) get Started in C. Knott and T. Scragg (eds.) Reflective Practice in Social Work, Exeter Learning Matters. McCarthy, T. and Galvani, S. (2004) SCARS A new model for social work with substance misusePractice, 16(2), 85-97. Milner, J. and OByrne P. (2002) estimation in Social Work Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan.Parker, J. (2010) Effective Practice in Social Work, Exeter Learning Matters. Miles, A. (19 87) The Mentally Ill in Contemporary Society, Oxford Blackwell. Parker, J. (2010) Effective Practice Learning in Social Work, Exeter Learning Matters. Ruch, G. (2002) From triangle to spiral reflective practice in social work education, practice and research, Social Work Education, 21(2), 199-216. Schn, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner, New York Basic Books. Schon, D. (2002) From technical rationality to reflection-in-action in R. Harrison, F. Reeve, A. Hanson and J. Clarke (eds) financial support Lifelong Learning Perspectives on Learning, London Routledge. Szasz, T. (1961) The Myth of Mental indisposition Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct, London Harper and Row. Teater, B. (2010) An Introduction to Applying Social Work Theories and Methods, Maidenhead Open University Press. Tew, J. (2005) Social Perspectives in Mental Health London Kingsley. Thompson, N. (2009) Practicing Social Work Meeting the Professional Challenge, Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan.Tober, G . and Raistrick, D. (2004) Organisation of Services Putting it all Together in T. Peterson and A. McBride (Eds.) Working with Substance Misusers A Guide to Theory and Practice, London Routledge. Trevithick, P. (2012) Social Work Skills A Practice Handbook, Maidenhead Open University Press. White, S. (2001) Auto-ethnography as reflexive enquiry The research act as self-surveillance, in I. Shaw and N. Gould (eds), Qualitative Research in Social Work, London Sage. Yip, K. (2006)Self-reflection in reflective practice A note of caution British Journal of Social Work, 36(5), 777-788.